Studying at the University of Verona
Here you can find information on the organisational aspects of the Programme, lecture timetables, learning activities and useful contact details for your time at the University, from enrolment to graduation.
Type D and Type F activities
This information is intended exclusively for students already enrolled in this course.If you are a new student interested in enrolling, you can find information about the course of study on the course page:
Laurea magistrale a ciclo unico in Giurisprudenza - Enrollment from 2025/2026Le attività che consentono l’acquisizione dei crediti riservati alle attività formative a libera scelta dello studente (TAF D) sono le seguenti:
• Un insegnamento previsto nell’elenco delle attività formative (TAF D) allegato al piano didattico del corso di laurea Magistrale in Giurisprudenza;
• Un insegnamento attivato nei Corsi di studi afferenti al Collegio di Giurisprudenza;
• Un laboratorio didattico attivato nei Corsi di studi afferenti al Collegio di Giurisprudenza;
• Un laboratorio didattico attivato nei Corsi di studi afferenti al Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche;
• Un insegnamento previsto dall’Offerta Formativa di Ateneo, non impartito nell’ambito dei corsi di studi afferenti al Collegio di Giurisprudenza: il riconoscimento dei crediti acquisiti sarà subordinato alla preventiva presentazione di coerenti programmi formativi valutati dalla Commissione istruttoria per la didattica e approvati dal Collegio didattico.
• Attività formative organizzate dai singoli docenti del Collegio di Giurisprudenza o del Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche: previa approvazione del Collegio ad esse verrà attribuito, dopo un’apposita verifica, un credito per ogni 6 ore di frequenza obbligatoria;
• Attività formative che implicano la partecipazione a convegni o seminari organizzati sotto il “logo” del Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche o dell’Ateneo: devono essere preventivamente approvate dal Collegio di Giurisprudenza indicando un docente di riferimento del Collegio di Giurisprudenza ovvero del Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche. Un credito per ogni giornata di convegno o di seminario si acquisisce dopo apposita verifica che dimostri l’avvenuta fruizione culturale del tema del convegno o del seminario.
Le attività che consentono l’acquisizione dei crediti riservati alle ulteriori attività formative (TAF F) sono le seguenti:
• Informatica (3 cfu)
• Stage;
• Un laboratorio didattico attivato nei Corsi di studi afferenti al Collegio di Giurisprudenza;
• Un laboratorio didattico attivato nei Corsi di studi afferenti al Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche.
Al link https://www.univr.it/it/i-nostri-servizi/segreterie-studenti/giurisprudenza#categdoc_7103 la modulistica per l'inserimento di attività non selezionabili in autonomia dallo studente in sede di compilazione del piano degli studi.
| years | Modules | TAF | Teacher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4° 5° | The fashion lab (1 ECTS) | D |
Caterina Fratea
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | The fashion lab (2 ECTS) | D |
Caterina Fratea
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | The fashion lab (3 ECTS) | D |
Caterina Fratea
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | Paradigm Shifts Beyond COVID-19: Individual v. Society and Private v. Public? | D | Not yet assigned |
| years | Modules | TAF | Teacher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4° 5° | Economics, financial statement and control of Italian healthcare and social care organizations | D |
Paolo Roffia
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | The fashion lab (1 ECTS) | D |
Caterina Fratea
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | The fashion lab (2 ECTS) | D |
Caterina Fratea
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | The fashion lab (3 ECTS) | D |
Caterina Fratea
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | Paradigm Shifts Beyond COVID-19: Individual v. Society and Private v. Public? | D | Not yet assigned |
| years | Modules | TAF | Teacher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4° 5° | Banking law | D |
Giovanni Meruzzi
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | CRISIS AND INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS LAW | D |
Valentina Baroncini
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | Roman Law and Civil Law Tradition - Training | D |
Marta Beghini
|
| 4° 5° | Roman Law and Civil Law Tradition - Training and Moot Court Competition | D |
Carlo Pelloso
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | Law of the digital economy | D |
Matteo Ortino
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | Safety and social security | D |
Sylvain Giovanni Nadalet
|
| 4° 5° | Sociology of law | D |
Carlo Lottieri
(Coordinator)
|
| years | Modules | TAF | Teacher |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4° 5° | Safe and security law | D |
Marco Peruzzi
|
| 4° 5° | Roman Law and Civil Law Tradition - Training | D |
Marta Beghini
|
| 4° 5° | Roman Law and Civil Law Tradition - Training and Moot Court Competition | D |
Carlo Pelloso
(Coordinator)
|
| 4° 5° | Legal Medicine | D |
Domenico De Leo
(Coordinator)
|
Comparative constitutional law (2021/2022)
Teaching code
4S01086
Teacher
Coordinator
Credits
6
Language
Italian
Scientific Disciplinary Sector (SSD)
IUS/21 - COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW
Period
1° periodo lezioni (1B) dal Nov 5, 2021 al Dec 16, 2021.
Learning outcomes
The course aims at providing students with an advanced knowledge of topics and methods of constitutional comparative law and an adequate knowledge of the institutions (sources of law, constitutional litigation, federalism and regionalism) into which the course has delved. At the end of the course, students shall be able to reflect in terms of legal institutions in comparative perspective, classify legal institutions according to comparative legal taxonomies and apply the comparative legal method. Students shall also have acquired the capacity to consciously use specific terms relating to comparative law themes and speak precisely about the constitutional law in comparative legal perspective.
Program
1. Defining Comparative Constitutional Justice.
2. Comparative method and constitutional justice: classifications and models of constitutional adjudication.
3. Composition and legitimacy of constitutional adjudicators.
4. Constitutional yardsticks. Object of review. Access to constitutional justice.
5. Ancillary powers of constitutional adjudicators.
6. Origins of the judicial review: from the English antecedents to the U.S. constitutional history.
7. Political v. judicial review. The French constitutional experience. Constitutional adjudication under Soviet and Islamic constitutions.
8. Concentrated v Diffuse judicial review. Judicial review in common law legal systems. The dissemination of the U.S. model outside the common law realm: Latino-American countries and Portugal. UK and Switzerland.
9. The Kelsenian model. Its circulation in Europe.
10. Judicial Review on federal grounds.
11. Litigating fundamental rights.
Those attending the course will actively participate in it. During the lectures, the class will discuss different models of judicial review and examine the most relevant judgements that have contributed to developing the role of constitutional adjudicators.
Bibliography
Examination Methods
Exam for attending students
Students that have regularly attended classes will take an oral exam.
During the course, they will deliver at least one presentation involving questions, case, and judgements dealt with during the course. The presentation will be assessed in order to determine the final mark.
The oral exam, on the other hand, will consist of an oral discussion, aims at verifying the knowledge of the fundamentals of comparative constitutional justice (as explained in class) in the light of the relevant scholarship and national and European case-law.
The final mark will be expressed in thirtieths.
Non-attending students
Non-attending students are required to take an oral exam. The exam will consist of an oral discussion, aims at verifying the knowledge of the fundamentals of comparative constitutional justice.
Erasmus students
Erasmus students that have regularly attended classes are granted the possibility to write an essay on a topic agreed by the instructor.
