Studying at the University of Verona

Here you can find information on the organisational aspects of the Programme, lecture timetables, learning activities and useful contact details for your time at the University, from enrolment to graduation.

This information is intended exclusively for students already enrolled in this course.
If you are a new student interested in enrolling, you can find information about the course of study on the course page:

Master's degree in Philosophy - Enrollment from 2025/2026

The Study Plan includes all modules, teaching and learning activities that each student will need to undertake during their time at the University.
Please select your Study Plan based on your enrollment year.

Legend | Type of training activity (TTA)

TAF (Type of Educational Activity) All courses and activities are classified into different types of educational activities, indicated by a letter.




S Placements in companies, public or private institutions and professional associations

Teaching code

4S02289

Credits

6

Language

Italian

Scientific Disciplinary Sector (SSD)

M-FIL/02 - LOGIC AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Period

Semestrino IIA, Semestrino IIB

Learning outcomes

The course concerns the formal analysis of natural language arguments and sentences, with a focus on philosophical argumentation. The main goals of the course are: (a) completing the basic logic training; (b) providing an introduction to quantified statements and first order inference; (c) presenting and discussing celebrated philosophical argumentations in a standard reconstruction.

Program

Prerequisites: none.

COURSE CONTENT

Preliminary issues:
Validity and soundness, formal languages and calculi, syntax e semantics.

Propositional logic:
Syntax, natural deduction, and semantics (truth tables).
Introduction to the analysis of arguments:

Formal analysis of arguments:
Analysis of quantified statements and first order inference, elements of predicate logic.

Discussion and analysis of philosophical arguments:
Discussion and formal analysis of philosophical arguments from metaphysics (e.g., arguments for and against the reality of change, of time, of material objects), ethics (e.g., arguments for and against the reality of free will), and epistemology (e.g. sceptic and anti-sceptic arguments).

DIDACTIC METHODS

All the topics dealt with in the course shall be introduced in the class, typically with the aid of either the blackboard or projections from screen.
The course is highly interactive. Students are asked to complete a number of exercises during the class, both by pen and paper and using the software that comes with the reference book (classes are held at a computer room; during the course the software will be always available there). Discussion on actual philosophical arguments and their reconstructions is encouraged.
Students that have bought the reference book may avail themselves of Grade grinder, an Internet grading service, to automatically evaluate their homework.
Fortnightly (or so) the teachers’ note will be made available.

REFERENCE BOOKS

Dave Barker-Plummer & Jon Barwise & John Etchemendy, Language, Proof and Logic (Edition 2), CSLI, Stanford 2011, chapters 1-9; it is recommended that students be acquainted with the software that comes with the book (i.e., the applications Tarski’s world, Fitch, and Boole). The book is available on the main online bookshops.

Teacher’s note (in Italian) available online at the end of the course.

Reference texts
Author Title Publishing house Year ISBN Notes
Dave Barker-Plummer & Jon Barwise & John Etchemendy Language, Proof and Logic (Edizione 2) CSLI Publications 2011 978-1-57586-632-1 IN ENGLISH

Examination Methods

Written test with optional oral examination.

Students with disabilities or specific learning disorders (SLD), who intend to request the adaptation of the exam, must follow the instructions given HERE

Teaching materials e documents